So everyone is poring over the recent Universal House of Justice (UHJ) message of March 25 2007 on Baha’i elections. You should read the UHJ’s letter for yourself but if you’re feeling lazy, I’ll offer to save you the trouble and summarize it:
A bunch of fluffy and very nice sounding rhetoric. A dash of quotes from the writings of Shoghi Effendi (kind of obligatory in a message from the UHJ). Followed by a lot of empty platitudes. And finally the real ‘meat’ of the letter, the reason why the Universal House of Justice wrote it in the first place and what they hope Baha’is ‘get’ about how to vote in this coming round of elections at Ridvan:
From among the pool of those whom the elector believes to be qualified to serve, selection should be made with due consideration given to such other factors as age distribution, diversity, and gender.
That’s in the 3rd to last paragraph by the way. Now, I totally sypmathize with the Universal House of Justice. They are faced with the Herculean task of trying to do something about the ossification of the administrative order. So by saying that, they are hoping that when when Baha’is gather this Ridvan (April 21st 2007) to vote for their new assemblies, they will vote in some new people.
It is not really news that in Baha’i communities everywhere, small and large, third world countries and first world contries, across all cultures and all nationalities, a very small group of Baha’is are elected to serve on assemblies over and over and over and over again. Leading communities into the death grip of group think, close mindedness and far too often, corruption and scandals. In fact, this unfortunate pattern can be found in the revolving door between the International Teaching Center and the Universal House of Justice – as well as the incumbancy inherent in the membership of the UHJ itself.
So I can totally understand and sympathize with the almost palpable desperation in the letter. Something must be done. I agree. Things just can not continue like this. I have some ideas of my own and I’ve run across some even better ones in Baha’i discussion groups. I will explore these ideas in the second part. But what I’d like to do in this first part is to explore the letter of the Universal House of Justice.
The House quotes Shoghi Effendi liberally in their March 25th letter on elections. If I may, I’d like to quote the Guardian as well:
“…I do not feel it to be in keeping with the spirit of the Cause to impose any limitation upon the freedom of the believers to choose those of any race, nationality or temperament, who best combine the essential qualifications for membership of administrative institutions. They should disregard personalities and concentrate their attention on the qualities and requirements of office, without prejudice, passion or partiality. The Assembly should be representative of the choicest and most varied and capable elements in every Baha’i community.”
(Letter from the Guardian to an individual believer: August 11, 1933)
This contradicts with what the House of Justice is saying in their letter (see above). But we do know that in the Baha’i Faith, a great deal of respect and leeway is given to minorities:
If any discrimination is at all to be tolerated, it should be a discrimination not against, but rather in favor of the minority, be it racial or otherwise… So great and vital is this principle that in such circumstances, as when an equal number of ballots have been cast in an election . . . [and] are balanced between the various races, faiths or nationalities within the community, priority should unhesitatingly be accorded the party representing the minority, and this for no other reason except to stimulate and encourage it, and afford it an opportunity to further the interests of the community.
(Shoghi Effendi – The Advent of Divine Justice, p. 34)
So what Shoghi Effendi is saying is that we must begin the process of Baha’i elections with the intention of choosing the best candidate for the job. And if as a result of doing so, we come face to face with a situation where there is a tie (“balance of votes”) then it should be broken in favour of the minority candidate.
That is a far cry from what the House of Justice is advocating: initiating the voting process with consideration given to “age, ethnic and gender diversity”. But again, while I may not see how the statement of the House of Justice is congruent with Shoghi Effendi’s clear exposition of the nature of Baha’i elections, I do sympathize with them.
And I believe there are much better and more effective ways of ‘fixing’ the broken Baha’i election process. But you’ll have to practice the virtue of patience and wait till the second part.

