Change is a Law of Nature

Sarah Brown, wife of the British Prime Minister took part in the London Pride march. Photograph copyrighted 2009, Marco SecchiLondon July 4th 2009: Sarah Brown, wife of the British Prime Minister took part the London Pride March. This photo is used with permission by photographer, © Marco Secchi 2008.

One of the most beautiful aspects of the Baha’i Writings in my view is that religious law can be flexible and adapt.

“The second classification or division comprises social laws and regulations applicable to human conduct. This is not the essential spiritual quality of religion. It is subject to change and transformation according to the exigencies and requirements of time and place.”

(Address by Abdu’l Baha Abbas before Congregation Emmanu-El, San Francisco, Cal.
(Martin A. Meyer, Rabbi) Saturday, October 12, 1912.
- Star of the West, Vol. 3, No. 13, p. 3)

Abdu’l-Baha places principles such as justice and equality into the first classification, as part of what all religion is concerned with and which does not change. By “second classificiation” Abdu’l-Baha is referring to daily practices that are to some degree related to social conditions while being based on principles in the first classification such as justice and equality.

Times are changed, and the need and fashion of the world are changed. Interference with creed and faith in every country causes manifest detriment, while justice and equal dealing towards all peoples on the face of the earth are the means whereby progress is effected.

(Abdu’l-Baha, A Traveller’s Narrative, p. 87)

While in London last month, I was reminded of the nature of change when I saw this photograph on the front pages of a newspaper and then read the accompanying article, about a public apology by the leader of the Tory party for past support for Section 28.

Section 28 (a ban on councils and schools promoting homosexuality as a valid lifestyle) was axed in 2003, but it was introduced in the 1980s under a Tory government which is why this apology is so significant. The words quoted in various newspapers were: “I’m sorry for Section 28. We got it wrong. It was an emotional issue. We have got to move on and we have moved on,”

Laws and statutes of governments civil and federal are in process of change and transformation. Sciences and arts are being moulded anew. Thoughts are metamorphosed. The foundations of human society are changing and strengthening.

(Abdu’l-Baha, Baha’i World Faith – Abdu’l-Baha Section, p. 228)

Seeing this image of the Prime Minister’s wife, Sarah Brown and another photograph of the Prime Minister meeting with Stonewall (they work to reduce homophobic bullying in schools), also part of the UK Gay Pride celebrations, gave me hope to think one day the Baha’i community could change too. Change enough so that gay Bahais wouldn’t lose their voting rights for doing what heterosexuals do: marry. We have a long way to go but that doesn’t mean that I have to give up.

The morals of humanity must undergo change. New remedies and solutions for human problems must be adopted. Human intellects themselves must change and be subject to the universal reformation. Just as the thoughts and hypotheses of past ages are fruitless today, likewise dogmas and codes of human invention are obsolete and barren of product in religion. Nay, it is true that they are the cause of enmity and conducive to strife in the world of humanity; war and bloodshed proceed from them, and the oneness of mankind finds no recognition in their observance. Therefore, it is our duty in this radiant century to investigate the essentials of divine religion, seek the realities underlying the oneness of the world of humanity and discover the source of fellowship and agreement which will unite mankind in the heavenly bond of love. This unity is the radiance of eternity, the divine spirituality, the effulgence of God and the bounty of the Kingdom. We must investigate the divine source of these heavenly bestowals and adhere unto them steadfastly. For if we remain fettered and restricted by human inventions and dogmas, day by day the world of mankind will be degraded, day by day warfare and strife will increase and satanic forces converge toward the destruction of the human race.

(Abdu’l-Baha, The Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 144)

A few months ago my gay Baha’i brother Daniel Orey received a letter from his NSA which began with “It is with deep sadness that the National Spiritual Assembly has learned that you openly married your male companion in a same sex marriage ceremony…” further on the letter states that the National Spiritual Assembly has no choice but to remove his Baha’i membership rights because of his marriage and of his “support of homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle for Baha’is”.

All are one people, one nation, one species, one kind. The common interest is complete equality; justice and equality amongst mankind are amongst the chief promoters of empire and the principal means to the extension of the skirt of conquest. …Times are changed, and the need and fashion of the world are changed… …justice and equal dealing towards all peoples on the face of the earth are the means whereby progress is effected.

(Abdu’l-Baha, A Traveller’s Narrative, p. 87)

So how can I respond to this as a Baha’i myself who believes that homosexuals are as equal as heterosexuals with the same rights and responsibilities? Daniel is one of the few gay Baha’is who has not been afraid to be honest and open. I don’t blame gay Baha’is who have partners in secret and admittedly if a heterosexual couple married as Daniel did, they might lose their voting rights as well, because he didn’t get his parents’ permission and hence couldn’t have a Baha’i ceremony. But I’ll stick to two points made in the NSA’s letter, because they seem to be the reason for his loss of his voting rights: “same sex ceremony” and “support of homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle for Baha’is.”

It should also be borne in mind that the machinery of the Cause has been so fashioned, that whatever is deemed necessary to incorporate into it in order to keep it in the forefront of all progressive movements, can, according to the provisions made by Bahá’u'lláh, be safely embodied therein.

(Shoghi Effendi, The World Order of Baha’u'llah, p. 22-23)

The topic of equality for homosexuals in the Bahai community often ends up with individuals getting emotional on one side or the other and there ends the dialogue. My attempt here is to see what we can do to move forward on this discussion because I do believe that the Bahai Teachings are for all of humanity and so far haven’t found anything in the Bahai Writings to contradict this. So as a Bahai I continue. This is an important issue for Baha’is to discuss, because, for example, in my own country, the Netherlands, it would be breaking the law to discriminate against homosexuals. I’m not suggesting for one minute that Dutch Law supercedes Baha’i Law, but we need to think about the issues involved in applying Baha’i principles in a changing world.

There’s obedience to one’s country on one hand. There’s the principle of equality. There’s the discussion about just what is the nature of marriage in the Bahai Writings? I would like to base this discussion on what is in the Writings, rather than what we have been told or heard is a Bahai Teaching. My attempt is not a protest nor any attempt to change any Baha’i Adiministration’s policy. My goal here is for a debate on this based on the Baha’i Writings because, I argue, if the Baha’i Teachings are so great, then we will find the answer by applying the Baha’i principles of justice and equality. We don’t need to pretend nor see it as a mystery, we can use science as our aid.

In various places Abdul-Baha states science is a way of keeping religion in balance as much as science needs ethics. And so back to my original thoughts on this topic: the theme of change as a principle of nature.

Science is the discoverer of the past. From its premises of past and present we deduce conclusions as to the future. Science is the governor of nature and its mysteries, the one agency by which man explores the institutions of material creation. All created things are captives of nature and subject to its laws. They cannot transgress the control of these laws in one detail or particular. The infinite starry worlds and heavenly bodies are nature’s obedient subjects. The earth and its myriad organisms, all minerals, plants and animals are thralls of its dominion. But man through the exercise of his scientific, intellectual power can rise out of this condition, can modify, change and control nature according to his own wishes and uses. Science, so to speak, is the breaker of the laws of nature.

(Abdu’l-Baha, The Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 29)

Here is my suggestion for a debate on this topic in the hope of creating an atmosphere of consultative dialogue from various viewponts. To break up the discussion on the topic of homosexuality into several topics so we could see what we can learn from each other. Topics I thought I should try for in later blogs are “the nature of marriage” and “science and religion.” Suggestions for other topics are welcome.

This topic is on the theme of “change”, what is the role of this in the Baha’i Teachings and practice? How does this relate to the Baha’i Writings which don’t change (the fact that they are authenticated and written and seen as Scripture)? And other Writings that are important such as Letters written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi? What Baha’i principles favour the acceptance of same-sex marriage today, and which Bahai principles restrict this?

No related posts.

  • DCO

    I think many of went thru that stage… “if I over compensate they won’t find me out”

    Its my feeling that most of the homophobes in the Faith are really closet cases… especially the ones that feel that it is a choice…

  • pey

    The problem really is the balance between literalism and spirit. There is no balance at the present in the Bahai community. It has turned more and more to a literalist approach mimicking Christian evangelical churches. For instance, if an atheist wants to marry a Bahai, they can’t have a Bahai wedding. Unless the atheist lies and utters the words “We shall verily abide by the will of God”. So if no Bahai wedding, then what? Remove the Bahai’s voting rights? In the environment today that would be done in the Bahai community. Instead of finding compromise and working within the spirit of whatever “law”. This is biggere than the gay issue my friend. It is about the future of this small declining religion.

  • Craig Parke

    I think anyone who has been in the Baha’i Faith for a long time will recognize the Cosmic Wisdom of perhaps a New Divine Law in the next Dispensation “No two Baha’is should EVER be permitted to marry each other!” THAT would indeed be a very helpful and very useful social law to advance the general mental health of people! I think it will be one of the First Laws of the next Manifestation who will most certainly be a woman. She will utter it when she rides up onto Mt. Carmel on her Harley!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izYTskwE0As

  • Anonymous

    And speaking of declining…I asked my nephew today why he didn’t go to Sunday classes. He told me that they are cancelled. There wasn’t anyone who wanted to teach the classes and not enough kids- so they didn’t start them back up this Fall. This is a good size city and capital in the South with a Bahai center. Truly sad! In a weird way, I’m actually heartbroken. This is not what I want to see, but oh well….

  • Pingback: “We will all, verily, abide by the will of God.” « Just a Bahai Blog

  • Guest

    Dear Sonja,

    As a 30-plus year Baha’i–and a trans-woman married to a cis woman–I dare not state my name for fear of administrative reprisals. That being said, how do I defend my religious beliefs to my own self, let alone to anyone else? Because of the Faith’s stand on same-sex marriages–along with the recent directive from the UHJ forbidding us from participating in equal-rights demonstrations for the LGBT community–I rarely refer to myself anymore as a Baha’i. I am ashamed of my religion which on the one hand preaches equality and justice and on the other hand prevents me from actively seeking it.

    Just knowing there are other Baha’i's who believe as I do gives me hope.

  • Pingback: It’s Getting Better: Baha’i Faith & Homosexuality « Just a Bahai Blog

  • JinxÇ

    I am proud to say that I have been a Bahá’i since the
    age of eleven when I first received my first personal revelation of the Faith.
    I still consider myself imperfect and by no means fully knowledgable on all
    aspects of the Faith and its teachings, when I compare myself to many of my
    more learned Bahá’í Friends. When I became a Bahá’í I was fully informed of the
    rules and laws of the Faith, which I wholeheartedly accepted. I would presume
    that anyone else who wandered the same path as I have would have done the
    same. 

     

    “… Therefore, in the beginning the believers
    must make their steps firm in the Covenant so that the confirmations
    of Baha’u’llah may encircle them from all sides, the cohorts of the Supreme Concourse may become their supporters and helpers,
    and the exhortations and advices of ‘Abdu’l-Baha, like unto the pictures
    engraved on stone, may remain permanent and ineffaceable in the tablets of all
    hearts.”  (”Tablets of the Divine Plan Revealed by ‘Abdu’l-Baha
    to the North American Baha’is” rev. ed. (Wilmette: Baha’i Publishing Trust,
    1977), p. 49)

     

    The purpose of this comment I would like to make is this: 

    If one is fully aware that in the Hindu religion the
    cow is sacred and that Hindu’s are forbidden to eat of its meat or kill a cow
    or mistreat a cow, how totally absurd it would be to suggest that one would
    become a Hindu, fully conscious of these sacred rules, and then seek to change
    these sacred rules of that religion to suit their own personal needs and/or
    requirement(s). 

     

    “That the forces of irreligion, of a purely
    materialistic philosophy, of unconcealed paganism have been unloosed, are now
    spreading, and, by consolidating themselves, are beginning to invade some of
    the most powerful Christian institutions of the western world, no unbiased
    observer can fail to admit. That these institutions are becoming increasingly
    restive, that a few among them are already dimly aware of the pervasive
    influence of the Cause of Bahá’u'lláh, that they will, as their inherent
    strength deteriorates and their discipline relaxes, regard with deepening
    dismay the rise of His New World Order, and will gradually determine to assail
    it, that such an opposition will in turn accelerate their decline, few, if any,
    among those who are attentively watching the progress of His Faith would be
    inclined to question.

    This menace of secularism that has attacked Islam and
    is undermining its remaining institutions, that has invaded Persia, has
    penetrated into India, and raised its triumphant head in Turkey, has already
    manifested itself in both Europe and America, and is, in varying degrees, and
    under various forms and designations, challenging the basis of every
    established religion…” (In a letter
    written by Shoghi Effendi, 11 March 1936 to the Bahá’ís of the West, published in
    “The World Order of Bahá’u'lláh: Selected Letters”, pp. 180-81)

     

    Therefore, the same applies to the rules of my Beloved
    Faith! For anyone to become a Bahá’í of their own accord and having full
    knowledge of the basic rules of the Faith to expect that such a Great
    Revelation and Institution will change its rules merely to suit the wishes of
    any individual would be equally absurd! Acceptance of and obediance to The
    Cause of God which has been sent down by the Pen on High is a basic principle
    of the Bahá’í Faith. 

     

    “The Baha’is must cling firmly to the knowledge
    that the Cause is safely in God’s hands, that the Covenant of Baha’u’llah is
    incorruptible and that they can have complete confidence in the ability of the
    Universal House of Justice to function “under the care and protection of the
    Abha Beauty, under the shelter and unerring guidance of His Holiness, the
    Exalted One”….” (28 May 1975, from a letter written on behalf of the
    Universal House of Justice to an individual believer)

    and

    “The Covenant is the “axis of the oneness of the
    world of humanity” because it preserves the unity and integrity of the Faith
    itself and protects it from being disrupted by individuals who are convinced
    that only their understanding of the Teachings is the right one — a fate that
    has overcome all past Revelations. The Covenant is, moreover, embedded in the
    Writings of Baha’u’llah Himself. Thus, as you clearly see, to accept
    Baha’u’llah is to accept His Covenant; to reject His Covenant is to reject
    Him.” (3 January 1982, from a letter written on behalf of
    the Universal House of Justice to an individual believer)

     

     

    The reason why certain behaviours are forbidden have
    clearly been laid down by Bahá’u'lláh, being that they are unacceptable,
    rather, abhorrent in the eyes of God, and I for one would not remain
    a member of this Faith if that were by any means to suddenly be changed by
    anyone. For me the sactity and preservation of the Faith is primary. 

     

    “It should also be borne in mind that the
    machinery of the Cause has been so fashioned, that whatever is deemed necessary
    to incorporate into it in order to keep it in the forefront of all progressive
    movements, can, according to the provisions made by Baha’u'llah, be safely
    embodied therein. To this testify the words of Baha’u'llah, as recorded in the
    Eighth Leaf of the exalted Paradise: “It is incumbent upon the Trustees of
    the House of Justice to take counsel together regarding those things which have
    not outwardly been revealed in the Book, and to enforce that which is agreeable
    to them. God will verily inspire them with whatsoever He willeth, and He,
    verily, is the Provider, the Omniscient.”… the House of Justice [has]
    been invested by Baha’u'llah with the authority to legislate whatsoever has not
    been explicitly and outwardly recorded in His holy Writ… Such is the
    immutability of His revealed Word. Such is the elasticity which characterizes
    the functions of His appointed ministers. The first preserves the identity of
    His Faith, and guards the integrity of His law. The second enables it, even as
    a living organism, to expand and adapt itself to the needs and requirements of
    an ever-changing society.” (Shoghi Effendi, World Order of Baha’u'llah, p. 22-3)

     

    The reason why most other religions are in so much
    chaos today is because they have been bowing to political and social pressures
    and have deviated far too much on far too many of their basic principles, which
    has cause division among their ranks.

     

    “Today, the most important affair is firmness in
    the Covenant, because firmness in the Covenant wards off differences.

    . . .Baha’u’llah covenanted, not that I (’Abdu’l-Baha)
    am the Promised One, but that ‘Abdu’l-Baha is the Expounder of the Book and the
    Centre of His Covenant, and that the Promised One of Baha’u’llah will appear
    after one thousand or thousands of years. This is the Covenant which
    Baha’u’llah made. If a person shall deviate, he is not acceptable at the
    Threshold of Baha’u’llah. In case of differences, ‘Abdu’l-Baha must be
    consulted. They must revolve around his good pleasure. After ‘Abdu’l-Baha,
    whenever the Universal House of Justice is organized it will ward off
    differences.”  (’Abdu’l-Baha, cited in “Star of the West”, vol. 4,
    no. 14 (November 1913), p. 237-38)

    and

    “Inasmuch as great differences and divergences of
    denominational belief had arisen throughout the past, every man with a new idea
    attributing it to God, Baha’u’llah desired that there should not be any ground
    or reason for disagreement among the Baha’is. Therefore, with His own pen He
    wrote the Book of His Covenant, addressing His relations and all people of the
    world, saying, “Verily, I have appointed One Who is the Center of My Covenant.
    All must obey Him; all must turn to Him; He is the Expounder of My Book, and He
    is informed of My purpose. All must turn to Him. Whatsoever He says is correct,
    for, verily, He knoweth the texts of My Book. Other than He, no one doth know
    My Book.” The purpose of this statement is that there should never be discord
    and divergence among the Baha’is but that they should always be unified and
    agreed…. Therefore, whosoever obeys the Center of the Covenant appointed by
    Baha’u’llah has obeyed Baha’u’llah, and whosoever disobeys Him has disobeyed
    Baha’u’llah….

    Beware! Beware! lest anyone should speak from the
    authority of his own thoughts or create a new thing out of himself. Beware!
    Beware! According to the explicit Covenant of Baha’u’llah you should care
    nothing at all for such a person. Baha’u’llah shuns such souls. “ (”The Promulgation
    of Universal Peace: Talks Delivered by ‘Abdu’l-Baha during His Visit to the
    United States and Canada in 1912, 2nd ed. (Wilmette:
    Baha’i Publishing Trust, 1982), pp. 322-23)

    and

    “Numerous and powerful have been the forces that have
    schemed, both from within and from without, in lands both far and near, to
    quench its light and abolish its holy name. Some have apostatized from its
    principles, and betrayed ignominiously its cause. Others have hurled against it
    the fiercest anathemas which the embittered leaders of any ecclesiastical
    institution are able to pronounce. Still others have heaped upon it the
    afflictions and humiliations which sovereign authority can alone, in the
    plenitude of its power, inflict.

    The utmost its avowed and secret enemies could hope to
    achieve was to retard its growth and obscure momentarily its purpose. What they
    actually accomplished was to purge and purify its life, to stir it to still
    greater depths, to galvanize its soul, to prune its institutions, and cement
    its unity. A schism, a permanent cleavage in the vast body of its adherents,
    they could never create.

    They who betrayed its cause, its lukewarm and
    faint-hearted supporters, withered away and dropped as dead leaves, powerless
    to cloud its radiance or to imperil its structure. Its most implacable
    adversaries, they who assailed it from without, were hurled from power, and, in
    the most astonishing fashion, met their doom…

    Meanwhile the Faith that had been the object of such
    monstrous betrayals, and the target for such woeful assaults, was going from
    strength to strength, was forging ahead, undaunted and undivided by the
    injuries it had received. In the midst of trials it had inspired its loyal
    followers with a resolution that no obstacle, however formidable, could
    undermine. It had lighted in their hearts a faith that no misfortune, however
    black, could quench. It had infused into their hearts a hope that no force,
    however determined, could shatter.” (Shoghi
    Effendi, The World Order of Baha’u’llah, p. 195)

    and

    “…the believers need to be deepened in
    their knowledge and appreciation of the Covenants of both Bahá’u’lláh and
    ‘Abdu’l-Bahá. This is the stronghold of the Faith of every Bahá’í, and that
    which enables him to withstand every test and the attacks of the enemies
    outside the Faith, and the far more dangerous, insidious, lukewarm people
    inside the Faith who have no real attachment to the Covenant, and consequently
    uphold the intellectual aspect of the teachings while at the same time undermining
    the spiritual foundation upon which the whole Cause of God rests.” (Written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi, The Light of Divine Guidance v II, p. 84)

    My personal suggestion to anyone who cannot accept the
    principles of this Great Cause of God to simply reevaluate your own motives and
    act according to your own conscience!

     

  • Baquia

    Welcome JinxÇ to BahaiRants and thanks for your comment (although you might want to see someone about your quotitis).

    Do you realize that according to the same covenant you use as a cudgel, Shoghi Effendi as Guardian does not and can not create Baha’i law? that neither Baha’u'llah nor Abdu’l-Baha said anything about homosexuality? and that the Guardian’s tentative writings on this issue are tenuous at best based on a handwritten note in the side margin of his copy of the Aqdas?

    This is not an issue of “bowing” to political or social pressure as you put it. Far from it. This is where you err in my humble opinion. You completely and utterly misunderstand the issue and cast it within an all too familiar framework of “us” vs. “them” which allows the corollary of dragging in a bagful of “covenant” quotes with which to bash everyone into submission.

    Thanks but no thanks. Been there, done that. Let’s move on to a real discussion now.

    Oh and you say “… I for one would not remain a member of this Faith if that were by any means to suddenly be changed by…
    anyone.”

    NEWSFLASH! You’re in the wrong religion my friend. The Baha’i Faith has a staggering amount of flexibility deliberately built into it and has metamorphosed to such a degree that an early believer would hardly recognize it today. Is that a bad thing? I don’t think so.

    I humbly suggest that you actually inquire about and study the religion that you purport to be so passionate about because while you can copy/paste like the wind, it is clear your comprehension could use some improvement.

    I don’t want to alarm you too much but here’s just one small example of “change” that you may find if and when you embark on a true journey of search and knowledge: originally Baha’i LSA’s were not democratically elected as they are now. Yikes!

    Didn’t mean to alarm you my dear friend. It is true. Here’s another (brace yourself!!) originally LSA’s and NSA’s were only open to men. That’s right. Baha’i women, no matter how educated, spiritual, skilled, etc. were not even able to stand as candidates.

    Double YIKES!!

    There are many more of course. But I’m sure your heart needs rest now. And you can find out more yourself. If you care to.

  • Fubar

    ” I would presume that anyone else who wandered the same path as I have would have done the same.”

    This is one of the basic problems with fundamentalist bahais, they assume that the satisfaction they get from being narrow-minded conformists is “normal”, and as such should be imposed on people, even if coercion is necessary.

    Cultural imperialism and medieval thinking.