<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change is a Law of Nature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html</link>
	<description>A Baha'i blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 19:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fubar</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-83687</link>
		<dc:creator>Fubar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-83687</guid>
		<description>&quot; I would presume that anyone else who wandered the same path as I have would have done the same.&quot;

This is one of the basic problems with fundamentalist bahais, they assume that the satisfaction they get from being narrow-minded conformists is &quot;normal&quot;, and as such should be imposed on people, even if coercion is necessary.

Cultural imperialism and medieval thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; I would presume that anyone else who wandered the same path as I have would have done the same.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is one of the basic problems with fundamentalist bahais, they assume that the satisfaction they get from being narrow-minded conformists is &#8220;normal&#8221;, and as such should be imposed on people, even if coercion is necessary.</p>
<p>Cultural imperialism and medieval thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baquia</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-83686</link>
		<dc:creator>Baquia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-83686</guid>
		<description>Welcome JinxÇ to BahaiRants and thanks for your comment (although you might want to see someone about your quotitis). 

Do you realize that according to the same covenant you use as a cudgel, Shoghi Effendi as Guardian does not and can not create Baha&#039;i law? that neither Baha&#039;u&#039;llah nor Abdu&#039;l-Baha said anything about homosexuality? and that the Guardian&#039;s tentative writings on this issue are tenuous at best based on a handwritten note in the side margin of his copy of the Aqdas? 

This is not an issue of &quot;bowing&quot; to political or social pressure as you put it. Far from it. This is where you err in my humble opinion. You completely and utterly misunderstand the issue and cast it within an all too familiar framework of &quot;us&quot; vs. &quot;them&quot; which allows the corollary of dragging in a bagful of &quot;covenant&quot; quotes with which to bash everyone into submission.

Thanks but no thanks. Been there, done that. Let&#039;s move on to a real discussion now.

Oh and you say &quot;... I for one would not remain a member of this Faith if that were by any means to suddenly be changed by...
anyone.&quot; 

NEWSFLASH! You&#039;re in the wrong religion my friend. The Baha&#039;i Faith has a staggering amount of flexibility deliberately built into it and has metamorphosed to such a degree that an early believer would hardly recognize it today. Is that a bad thing? I don&#039;t think so.

I humbly suggest that you actually inquire about and study the religion that you purport to be so passionate about because while you can copy/paste like the wind, it is clear your comprehension could use some improvement.

I don&#039;t want to alarm you too much but here&#039;s just one small example of &quot;change&quot; that you may find if and when you embark on a true journey of search and knowledge: originally Baha&#039;i LSA&#039;s were not democratically elected as they are now. Yikes!

Didn&#039;t mean to alarm you my dear friend. It is true. Here&#039;s another (brace yourself!!) originally LSA&#039;s and NSA&#039;s were only open to men. That&#039;s right. Baha&#039;i women, no matter how educated, spiritual, skilled, etc. were not even able to stand as candidates.

Double YIKES!!

There are many more of course. But I&#039;m sure your heart needs rest now. And you can find out more yourself. If you care to.
                                 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome JinxÇ to BahaiRants and thanks for your comment (although you might want to see someone about your quotitis). </p>
<p>Do you realize that according to the same covenant you use as a cudgel, Shoghi Effendi as Guardian does not and can not create Baha&#8217;i law? that neither Baha&#8217;u'llah nor Abdu&#8217;l-Baha said anything about homosexuality? and that the Guardian&#8217;s tentative writings on this issue are tenuous at best based on a handwritten note in the side margin of his copy of the Aqdas? </p>
<p>This is not an issue of &#8220;bowing&#8221; to political or social pressure as you put it. Far from it. This is where you err in my humble opinion. You completely and utterly misunderstand the issue and cast it within an all too familiar framework of &#8220;us&#8221; vs. &#8220;them&#8221; which allows the corollary of dragging in a bagful of &#8220;covenant&#8221; quotes with which to bash everyone into submission.</p>
<p>Thanks but no thanks. Been there, done that. Let&#8217;s move on to a real discussion now.</p>
<p>Oh and you say &#8220;&#8230; I for one would not remain a member of this Faith if that were by any means to suddenly be changed by&#8230;<br />
anyone.&#8221; </p>
<p>NEWSFLASH! You&#8217;re in the wrong religion my friend. The Baha&#8217;i Faith has a staggering amount of flexibility deliberately built into it and has metamorphosed to such a degree that an early believer would hardly recognize it today. Is that a bad thing? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>I humbly suggest that you actually inquire about and study the religion that you purport to be so passionate about because while you can copy/paste like the wind, it is clear your comprehension could use some improvement.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to alarm you too much but here&#8217;s just one small example of &#8220;change&#8221; that you may find if and when you embark on a true journey of search and knowledge: originally Baha&#8217;i LSA&#8217;s were not democratically elected as they are now. Yikes!</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t mean to alarm you my dear friend. It is true. Here&#8217;s another (brace yourself!!) originally LSA&#8217;s and NSA&#8217;s were only open to men. That&#8217;s right. Baha&#8217;i women, no matter how educated, spiritual, skilled, etc. were not even able to stand as candidates.</p>
<p>Double YIKES!!</p>
<p>There are many more of course. But I&#8217;m sure your heart needs rest now. And you can find out more yourself. If you care to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JinxÇ</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-83685</link>
		<dc:creator>JinxÇ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-83685</guid>
		<description>I am proud to say that I have been a Bahá&#039;i since the
age of eleven when I first received my first personal revelation of the Faith.
I still consider myself imperfect and by no means fully knowledgable on all
aspects of the Faith and its teachings, when I compare myself to many of my
more learned Bahá&#039;í Friends. When I became a Bahá&#039;í I was fully informed of the
rules and laws of the Faith, which I wholeheartedly accepted. I would presume
that anyone else who wandered the same path as I have would have done the
same. 


 


&quot;... Therefore, in the beginning the believers
must make their steps firm in the Covenant so that the confirmations
of Baha’u&#039;llah may encircle them from all sides, the cohorts of the Supreme Concourse may become their supporters and helpers,
and the exhortations and advices of ‘Abdu’l-Baha, like unto the pictures
engraved on stone, may remain permanent and ineffaceable in the tablets of all
hearts.&quot;  (”Tablets of the Divine Plan Revealed by ‘Abdu’l-Baha
to the North American Baha’is” rev. ed. (Wilmette: Baha’i Publishing Trust,
1977), p. 49)


 


The purpose of this comment I would like to make is this: 


If one is fully aware that in the Hindu religion the
cow is sacred and that Hindu&#039;s are forbidden to eat of its meat or kill a cow
or mistreat a cow, how totally absurd it would be to suggest that one would
become a Hindu, fully conscious of these sacred rules, and then seek to change
these sacred rules of that religion to suit their own personal needs and/or
requirement(s). 


 


&quot;That the forces of irreligion, of a purely
materialistic philosophy, of unconcealed paganism have been unloosed, are now
spreading, and, by consolidating themselves, are beginning to invade some of
the most powerful Christian institutions of the western world, no unbiased
observer can fail to admit. That these institutions are becoming increasingly
restive, that a few among them are already dimly aware of the pervasive
influence of the Cause of Bahá&#039;u&#039;lláh, that they will, as their inherent
strength deteriorates and their discipline relaxes, regard with deepening
dismay the rise of His New World Order, and will gradually determine to assail
it, that such an opposition will in turn accelerate their decline, few, if any,
among those who are attentively watching the progress of His Faith would be
inclined to question.


This menace of secularism that has attacked Islam and
is undermining its remaining institutions, that has invaded Persia, has
penetrated into India, and raised its triumphant head in Turkey, has already
manifested itself in both Europe and America, and is, in varying degrees, and
under various forms and designations, challenging the basis of every
established religion...&quot; (In a letter
written by Shoghi Effendi, 11 March 1936 to the Bahá&#039;ís of the West, published in
&quot;The World Order of Bahá&#039;u&#039;lláh: Selected Letters&quot;, pp. 180-81)


 


Therefore, the same applies to the rules of my Beloved
Faith! For anyone to become a Bahá&#039;í of their own accord and having full
knowledge of the basic rules of the Faith to expect that such a Great
Revelation and Institution will change its rules merely to suit the wishes of
any individual would be equally absurd! Acceptance of and obediance to The
Cause of God which has been sent down by the Pen on High is a basic principle
of the Bahá&#039;í Faith. 


 


&quot;The Baha’is must cling firmly to the knowledge
that the Cause is safely in God’s hands, that the Covenant of Baha’u&#039;llah is
incorruptible and that they can have complete confidence in the ability of the
Universal House of Justice to function “under the care and protection of the
Abha Beauty, under the shelter and unerring guidance of His Holiness, the
Exalted One”….&quot; (28 May 1975, from a letter written on behalf of the
Universal House of Justice to an individual believer)


and


&quot;The Covenant is the “axis of the oneness of the
world of humanity” because it preserves the unity and integrity of the Faith
itself and protects it from being disrupted by individuals who are convinced
that only their understanding of the Teachings is the right one — a fate that
has overcome all past Revelations. The Covenant is, moreover, embedded in the
Writings of Baha’u&#039;llah Himself. Thus, as you clearly see, to accept
Baha’u&#039;llah is to accept His Covenant; to reject His Covenant is to reject
Him.&quot; (3 January 1982, from a letter written on behalf of
the Universal House of Justice to an individual believer)


 


 


The reason why certain behaviours are forbidden have
clearly been laid down by Bahá&#039;u&#039;lláh, being that they are unacceptable,
rather, abhorrent in the eyes of God, and I for one would not remain
a member of this Faith if that were by any means to suddenly be changed by
anyone. For me the sactity and preservation of the Faith is primary. 


 


&quot;It should also be borne in mind that the
machinery of the Cause has been so fashioned, that whatever is deemed necessary
to incorporate into it in order to keep it in the forefront of all progressive
movements, can, according to the provisions made by Baha&#039;u&#039;llah, be safely
embodied therein. To this testify the words of Baha&#039;u&#039;llah, as recorded in the
Eighth Leaf of the exalted Paradise: &quot;It is incumbent upon the Trustees of
the House of Justice to take counsel together regarding those things which have
not outwardly been revealed in the Book, and to enforce that which is agreeable
to them. God will verily inspire them with whatsoever He willeth, and He,
verily, is the Provider, the Omniscient.&quot;... the House of Justice [has]
been invested by Baha&#039;u&#039;llah with the authority to legislate whatsoever has not
been explicitly and outwardly recorded in His holy Writ... Such is the
immutability of His revealed Word. Such is the elasticity which characterizes
the functions of His appointed ministers. The first preserves the identity of
His Faith, and guards the integrity of His law. The second enables it, even as
a living organism, to expand and adapt itself to the needs and requirements of
an ever-changing society.&quot; (Shoghi Effendi, World Order of Baha&#039;u&#039;llah, p. 22-3)


 


The reason why most other religions are in so much
chaos today is because they have been bowing to political and social pressures
and have deviated far too much on far too many of their basic principles, which
has cause division among their ranks.


 


&quot;Today, the most important affair is firmness in
the Covenant, because firmness in the Covenant wards off differences.


. . .Baha’u&#039;llah covenanted, not that I (’Abdu’l-Baha)
am the Promised One, but that ‘Abdu’l-Baha is the Expounder of the Book and the
Centre of His Covenant, and that the Promised One of Baha’u&#039;llah will appear
after one thousand or thousands of years. This is the Covenant which
Baha’u&#039;llah made. If a person shall deviate, he is not acceptable at the
Threshold of Baha’u&#039;llah. In case of differences, ‘Abdu’l-Baha must be
consulted. They must revolve around his good pleasure. After ‘Abdu’l-Baha,
whenever the Universal House of Justice is organized it will ward off
differences.&quot;  (’Abdu’l-Baha, cited in “Star of the West”, vol. 4,
no. 14 (November 1913), p. 237-38)


and


&quot;Inasmuch as great differences and divergences of
denominational belief had arisen throughout the past, every man with a new idea
attributing it to God, Baha’u&#039;llah desired that there should not be any ground
or reason for disagreement among the Baha’is. Therefore, with His own pen He
wrote the Book of His Covenant, addressing His relations and all people of the
world, saying, “Verily, I have appointed One Who is the Center of My Covenant.
All must obey Him; all must turn to Him; He is the Expounder of My Book, and He
is informed of My purpose. All must turn to Him. Whatsoever He says is correct,
for, verily, He knoweth the texts of My Book. Other than He, no one doth know
My Book.” The purpose of this statement is that there should never be discord
and divergence among the Baha’is but that they should always be unified and
agreed…. Therefore, whosoever obeys the Center of the Covenant appointed by
Baha’u&#039;llah has obeyed Baha’u&#039;llah, and whosoever disobeys Him has disobeyed
Baha’u&#039;llah….


Beware! Beware! lest anyone should speak from the
authority of his own thoughts or create a new thing out of himself. Beware!
Beware! According to the explicit Covenant of Baha’u&#039;llah you should care
nothing at all for such a person. Baha’u&#039;llah shuns such souls. &quot; (”The Promulgation
of Universal Peace: Talks Delivered by ‘Abdu’l-Baha during His Visit to the
United States and Canada in 1912, 2nd ed. (Wilmette:
Baha’i Publishing Trust, 1982), pp. 322-23)


and


&quot;Numerous and powerful have been the forces that have
schemed, both from within and from without, in lands both far and near, to
quench its light and abolish its holy name. Some have apostatized from its
principles, and betrayed ignominiously its cause. Others have hurled against it
the fiercest anathemas which the embittered leaders of any ecclesiastical
institution are able to pronounce. Still others have heaped upon it the
afflictions and humiliations which sovereign authority can alone, in the
plenitude of its power, inflict.


The utmost its avowed and secret enemies could hope to
achieve was to retard its growth and obscure momentarily its purpose. What they
actually accomplished was to purge and purify its life, to stir it to still
greater depths, to galvanize its soul, to prune its institutions, and cement
its unity. A schism, a permanent cleavage in the vast body of its adherents,
they could never create.


They who betrayed its cause, its lukewarm and
faint-hearted supporters, withered away and dropped as dead leaves, powerless
to cloud its radiance or to imperil its structure. Its most implacable
adversaries, they who assailed it from without, were hurled from power, and, in
the most astonishing fashion, met their doom…


Meanwhile the Faith that had been the object of such
monstrous betrayals, and the target for such woeful assaults, was going from
strength to strength, was forging ahead, undaunted and undivided by the
injuries it had received. In the midst of trials it had inspired its loyal
followers with a resolution that no obstacle, however formidable, could
undermine. It had lighted in their hearts a faith that no misfortune, however
black, could quench. It had infused into their hearts a hope that no force,
however determined, could shatter.&quot; (Shoghi
Effendi, The World Order of Baha’u&#039;llah, p. 195)


and


&quot;…the believers need to be deepened in
their knowledge and appreciation of the Covenants of both Bahá’u’lláh and
‘Abdu’l-Bahá. This is the stronghold of the Faith of every Bahá’í, and that
which enables him to withstand every test and the attacks of the enemies
outside the Faith, and the far more dangerous, insidious, lukewarm people
inside the Faith who have no real attachment to the Covenant, and consequently
uphold the intellectual aspect of the teachings while at the same time undermining
the spiritual foundation upon which the whole Cause of God rests.&quot; (Written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi, The Light of Divine Guidance v II, p. 84)




My personal suggestion to anyone who cannot accept the
principles of this Great Cause of God to simply reevaluate your own motives and
act according to your own conscience!


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am proud to say that I have been a Bahá&#8217;i since the<br />
age of eleven when I first received my first personal revelation of the Faith.<br />
I still consider myself imperfect and by no means fully knowledgable on all<br />
aspects of the Faith and its teachings, when I compare myself to many of my<br />
more learned Bahá&#8217;í Friends. When I became a Bahá&#8217;í I was fully informed of the<br />
rules and laws of the Faith, which I wholeheartedly accepted. I would presume<br />
that anyone else who wandered the same path as I have would have done the<br />
same. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; Therefore, in the beginning the believers<br />
must make their steps firm in the Covenant so that the confirmations<br />
of Baha’u&#8217;llah may encircle them from all sides, the cohorts of the Supreme Concourse may become their supporters and helpers,<br />
and the exhortations and advices of ‘Abdu’l-Baha, like unto the pictures<br />
engraved on stone, may remain permanent and ineffaceable in the tablets of all<br />
hearts.&#8221;  (”Tablets of the Divine Plan Revealed by ‘Abdu’l-Baha<br />
to the North American Baha’is” rev. ed. (Wilmette: Baha’i Publishing Trust,<br />
1977), p. 49)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this comment I would like to make is this: </p>
<p>If one is fully aware that in the Hindu religion the<br />
cow is sacred and that Hindu&#8217;s are forbidden to eat of its meat or kill a cow<br />
or mistreat a cow, how totally absurd it would be to suggest that one would<br />
become a Hindu, fully conscious of these sacred rules, and then seek to change<br />
these sacred rules of that religion to suit their own personal needs and/or<br />
requirement(s). </p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;That the forces of irreligion, of a purely<br />
materialistic philosophy, of unconcealed paganism have been unloosed, are now<br />
spreading, and, by consolidating themselves, are beginning to invade some of<br />
the most powerful Christian institutions of the western world, no unbiased<br />
observer can fail to admit. That these institutions are becoming increasingly<br />
restive, that a few among them are already dimly aware of the pervasive<br />
influence of the Cause of Bahá&#8217;u'lláh, that they will, as their inherent<br />
strength deteriorates and their discipline relaxes, regard with deepening<br />
dismay the rise of His New World Order, and will gradually determine to assail<br />
it, that such an opposition will in turn accelerate their decline, few, if any,<br />
among those who are attentively watching the progress of His Faith would be<br />
inclined to question.</p>
<p>This menace of secularism that has attacked Islam and<br />
is undermining its remaining institutions, that has invaded Persia, has<br />
penetrated into India, and raised its triumphant head in Turkey, has already<br />
manifested itself in both Europe and America, and is, in varying degrees, and<br />
under various forms and designations, challenging the basis of every<br />
established religion&#8230;&#8221; (In a letter<br />
written by Shoghi Effendi, 11 March 1936 to the Bahá&#8217;ís of the West, published in<br />
&#8220;The World Order of Bahá&#8217;u'lláh: Selected Letters&#8221;, pp. 180-81)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Therefore, the same applies to the rules of my Beloved<br />
Faith! For anyone to become a Bahá&#8217;í of their own accord and having full<br />
knowledge of the basic rules of the Faith to expect that such a Great<br />
Revelation and Institution will change its rules merely to suit the wishes of<br />
any individual would be equally absurd! Acceptance of and obediance to The<br />
Cause of God which has been sent down by the Pen on High is a basic principle<br />
of the Bahá&#8217;í Faith. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;The Baha’is must cling firmly to the knowledge<br />
that the Cause is safely in God’s hands, that the Covenant of Baha’u&#8217;llah is<br />
incorruptible and that they can have complete confidence in the ability of the<br />
Universal House of Justice to function “under the care and protection of the<br />
Abha Beauty, under the shelter and unerring guidance of His Holiness, the<br />
Exalted One”….&#8221; (28 May 1975, from a letter written on behalf of the<br />
Universal House of Justice to an individual believer)</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;The Covenant is the “axis of the oneness of the<br />
world of humanity” because it preserves the unity and integrity of the Faith<br />
itself and protects it from being disrupted by individuals who are convinced<br />
that only their understanding of the Teachings is the right one — a fate that<br />
has overcome all past Revelations. The Covenant is, moreover, embedded in the<br />
Writings of Baha’u&#8217;llah Himself. Thus, as you clearly see, to accept<br />
Baha’u&#8217;llah is to accept His Covenant; to reject His Covenant is to reject<br />
Him.&#8221; (3 January 1982, from a letter written on behalf of<br />
the Universal House of Justice to an individual believer)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The reason why certain behaviours are forbidden have<br />
clearly been laid down by Bahá&#8217;u'lláh, being that they are unacceptable,<br />
rather, abhorrent in the eyes of God, and I for one would not remain<br />
a member of this Faith if that were by any means to suddenly be changed by<br />
anyone. For me the sactity and preservation of the Faith is primary. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;It should also be borne in mind that the<br />
machinery of the Cause has been so fashioned, that whatever is deemed necessary<br />
to incorporate into it in order to keep it in the forefront of all progressive<br />
movements, can, according to the provisions made by Baha&#8217;u'llah, be safely<br />
embodied therein. To this testify the words of Baha&#8217;u'llah, as recorded in the<br />
Eighth Leaf of the exalted Paradise: &#8220;It is incumbent upon the Trustees of<br />
the House of Justice to take counsel together regarding those things which have<br />
not outwardly been revealed in the Book, and to enforce that which is agreeable<br />
to them. God will verily inspire them with whatsoever He willeth, and He,<br />
verily, is the Provider, the Omniscient.&#8221;&#8230; the House of Justice [has]<br />
been invested by Baha&#8217;u'llah with the authority to legislate whatsoever has not<br />
been explicitly and outwardly recorded in His holy Writ&#8230; Such is the<br />
immutability of His revealed Word. Such is the elasticity which characterizes<br />
the functions of His appointed ministers. The first preserves the identity of<br />
His Faith, and guards the integrity of His law. The second enables it, even as<br />
a living organism, to expand and adapt itself to the needs and requirements of<br />
an ever-changing society.&#8221; (Shoghi Effendi, World Order of Baha&#8217;u'llah, p. 22-3)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The reason why most other religions are in so much<br />
chaos today is because they have been bowing to political and social pressures<br />
and have deviated far too much on far too many of their basic principles, which<br />
has cause division among their ranks.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;Today, the most important affair is firmness in<br />
the Covenant, because firmness in the Covenant wards off differences.</p>
<p>. . .Baha’u&#8217;llah covenanted, not that I (’Abdu’l-Baha)<br />
am the Promised One, but that ‘Abdu’l-Baha is the Expounder of the Book and the<br />
Centre of His Covenant, and that the Promised One of Baha’u&#8217;llah will appear<br />
after one thousand or thousands of years. This is the Covenant which<br />
Baha’u&#8217;llah made. If a person shall deviate, he is not acceptable at the<br />
Threshold of Baha’u&#8217;llah. In case of differences, ‘Abdu’l-Baha must be<br />
consulted. They must revolve around his good pleasure. After ‘Abdu’l-Baha,<br />
whenever the Universal House of Justice is organized it will ward off<br />
differences.&#8221;  (’Abdu’l-Baha, cited in “Star of the West”, vol. 4,<br />
no. 14 (November 1913), p. 237-38)</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;Inasmuch as great differences and divergences of<br />
denominational belief had arisen throughout the past, every man with a new idea<br />
attributing it to God, Baha’u&#8217;llah desired that there should not be any ground<br />
or reason for disagreement among the Baha’is. Therefore, with His own pen He<br />
wrote the Book of His Covenant, addressing His relations and all people of the<br />
world, saying, “Verily, I have appointed One Who is the Center of My Covenant.<br />
All must obey Him; all must turn to Him; He is the Expounder of My Book, and He<br />
is informed of My purpose. All must turn to Him. Whatsoever He says is correct,<br />
for, verily, He knoweth the texts of My Book. Other than He, no one doth know<br />
My Book.” The purpose of this statement is that there should never be discord<br />
and divergence among the Baha’is but that they should always be unified and<br />
agreed…. Therefore, whosoever obeys the Center of the Covenant appointed by<br />
Baha’u&#8217;llah has obeyed Baha’u&#8217;llah, and whosoever disobeys Him has disobeyed<br />
Baha’u&#8217;llah….</p>
<p>Beware! Beware! lest anyone should speak from the<br />
authority of his own thoughts or create a new thing out of himself. Beware!<br />
Beware! According to the explicit Covenant of Baha’u&#8217;llah you should care<br />
nothing at all for such a person. Baha’u&#8217;llah shuns such souls. &#8220; (”The Promulgation<br />
of Universal Peace: Talks Delivered by ‘Abdu’l-Baha during His Visit to the<br />
United States and Canada in 1912, 2nd ed. (Wilmette:<br />
Baha’i Publishing Trust, 1982), pp. 322-23)</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;Numerous and powerful have been the forces that have<br />
schemed, both from within and from without, in lands both far and near, to<br />
quench its light and abolish its holy name. Some have apostatized from its<br />
principles, and betrayed ignominiously its cause. Others have hurled against it<br />
the fiercest anathemas which the embittered leaders of any ecclesiastical<br />
institution are able to pronounce. Still others have heaped upon it the<br />
afflictions and humiliations which sovereign authority can alone, in the<br />
plenitude of its power, inflict.</p>
<p>The utmost its avowed and secret enemies could hope to<br />
achieve was to retard its growth and obscure momentarily its purpose. What they<br />
actually accomplished was to purge and purify its life, to stir it to still<br />
greater depths, to galvanize its soul, to prune its institutions, and cement<br />
its unity. A schism, a permanent cleavage in the vast body of its adherents,<br />
they could never create.</p>
<p>They who betrayed its cause, its lukewarm and<br />
faint-hearted supporters, withered away and dropped as dead leaves, powerless<br />
to cloud its radiance or to imperil its structure. Its most implacable<br />
adversaries, they who assailed it from without, were hurled from power, and, in<br />
the most astonishing fashion, met their doom…</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Faith that had been the object of such<br />
monstrous betrayals, and the target for such woeful assaults, was going from<br />
strength to strength, was forging ahead, undaunted and undivided by the<br />
injuries it had received. In the midst of trials it had inspired its loyal<br />
followers with a resolution that no obstacle, however formidable, could<br />
undermine. It had lighted in their hearts a faith that no misfortune, however<br />
black, could quench. It had infused into their hearts a hope that no force,<br />
however determined, could shatter.&#8221; (Shoghi<br />
Effendi, The World Order of Baha’u&#8217;llah, p. 195)</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;…the believers need to be deepened in<br />
their knowledge and appreciation of the Covenants of both Bahá’u’lláh and<br />
‘Abdu’l-Bahá. This is the stronghold of the Faith of every Bahá’í, and that<br />
which enables him to withstand every test and the attacks of the enemies<br />
outside the Faith, and the far more dangerous, insidious, lukewarm people<br />
inside the Faith who have no real attachment to the Covenant, and consequently<br />
uphold the intellectual aspect of the teachings while at the same time undermining<br />
the spiritual foundation upon which the whole Cause of God rests.&#8221; (Written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi, The Light of Divine Guidance v II, p. 84)</p>
<p>My personal suggestion to anyone who cannot accept the<br />
principles of this Great Cause of God to simply reevaluate your own motives and<br />
act according to your own conscience!</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s Getting Better: Baha’i Faith &#38; Homosexuality &#171; Just a Bahai Blog</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-83678</link>
		<dc:creator>It’s Getting Better: Baha’i Faith &#38; Homosexuality &#171; Just a Bahai Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-83678</guid>
		<description>[...] rights citing his same-sex marriage as the reason (I wrote a blog in response to this here [on Baquia&#039;s blog placed later on this blog)] in 2009. Now with this new policy of the UHJ, if the NSA of the USA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rights citing his same-sex marriage as the reason (I wrote a blog in response to this here [on Baquia&#039;s blog placed later on this blog)] in 2009. Now with this new policy of the UHJ, if the NSA of the USA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-83589</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-83589</guid>
		<description>Dear Sonja,

As a 30-plus year Baha&#039;i--and a trans-woman married to a cis woman--I dare not state my name for fear of administrative reprisals. That being said, how do I defend my religious beliefs to my own self, let alone to anyone else? Because of the Faith&#039;s stand on same-sex marriages--along with the recent directive from the UHJ forbidding us from participating in equal-rights demonstrations for the LGBT community--I rarely refer to myself anymore as a Baha&#039;i. I am ashamed of my religion which on the one hand preaches equality and justice and on the other hand prevents me from actively seeking it.

Just knowing there are other Baha&#039;i&#039;s who believe as I do gives me hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sonja,</p>
<p>As a 30-plus year Baha&#8217;i&#8211;and a trans-woman married to a cis woman&#8211;I dare not state my name for fear of administrative reprisals. That being said, how do I defend my religious beliefs to my own self, let alone to anyone else? Because of the Faith&#8217;s stand on same-sex marriages&#8211;along with the recent directive from the UHJ forbidding us from participating in equal-rights demonstrations for the LGBT community&#8211;I rarely refer to myself anymore as a Baha&#8217;i. I am ashamed of my religion which on the one hand preaches equality and justice and on the other hand prevents me from actively seeking it.</p>
<p>Just knowing there are other Baha&#8217;i's who believe as I do gives me hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;We will all, verily, abide by the will of God.&#8221; &#171; Just a Bahai Blog</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-82365</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;We will all, verily, abide by the will of God.&#8221; &#171; Just a Bahai Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-82365</guid>
		<description>[...] other postings I&#8217;ve gone more into the status of the letters written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi. First [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other postings I&#8217;ve gone more into the status of the letters written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi. First [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-82084</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-82084</guid>
		<description>And speaking of declining...I asked my nephew today why he didn&#039;t go to Sunday classes. He told me that they are cancelled. There wasn&#039;t anyone who wanted to teach the classes and not enough kids- so they didn&#039;t start them back up this Fall. This is a good size city and capital in the South with a Bahai center. Truly sad! In a weird way, I&#039;m actually heartbroken. This is not what I want to see, but oh well....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And speaking of declining&#8230;I asked my nephew today why he didn&#8217;t go to Sunday classes. He told me that they are cancelled. There wasn&#8217;t anyone who wanted to teach the classes and not enough kids- so they didn&#8217;t start them back up this Fall. This is a good size city and capital in the South with a Bahai center. Truly sad! In a weird way, I&#8217;m actually heartbroken. This is not what I want to see, but oh well&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Parke</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-82083</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Parke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-82083</guid>
		<description>I think anyone who has been in the Baha&#039;i Faith for a long time will recognize the Cosmic Wisdom of perhaps a New Divine Law in the next Dispensation &quot;No two Baha&#039;is should EVER be permitted to marry each other!&quot; THAT would indeed be a very helpful and very useful social law to advance the general mental health of people! I think it will be one of the First Laws of the next Manifestation who will most certainly be a woman. She will utter it when she rides up onto Mt. Carmel on her Harley!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izYTskwE0As
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think anyone who has been in the Baha&#8217;i Faith for a long time will recognize the Cosmic Wisdom of perhaps a New Divine Law in the next Dispensation &#8220;No two Baha&#8217;is should EVER be permitted to marry each other!&#8221; THAT would indeed be a very helpful and very useful social law to advance the general mental health of people! I think it will be one of the First Laws of the next Manifestation who will most certainly be a woman. She will utter it when she rides up onto Mt. Carmel on her Harley!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izYTskwE0As" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izYTskwE0As</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pey</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/change-is-a-law-of-nature-666.html/comment-page-16#comment-82082</link>
		<dc:creator>pey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/?p=666#comment-82082</guid>
		<description>The problem really is the balance between literalism and spirit. There is no balance at the present in the Bahai community. It has turned more and more to a literalist approach mimicking Christian evangelical churches. For instance, if an atheist wants to marry a Bahai, they can&#039;t have a Bahai wedding. Unless the atheist lies and utters the words &quot;We shall verily abide by the will of God&quot;. So if no Bahai wedding, then what? Remove the Bahai&#039;s voting rights? In the environment today that would be done in the Bahai community. Instead of finding compromise and working within the spirit of whatever &quot;law&quot;. This is biggere than the gay issue my friend. It is about the future of this small declining religion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem really is the balance between literalism and spirit. There is no balance at the present in the Bahai community. It has turned more and more to a literalist approach mimicking Christian evangelical churches. For instance, if an atheist wants to marry a Bahai, they can&#8217;t have a Bahai wedding. Unless the atheist lies and utters the words &#8220;We shall verily abide by the will of God&#8221;. So if no Bahai wedding, then what? Remove the Bahai&#8217;s voting rights? In the environment today that would be done in the Bahai community. Instead of finding compromise and working within the spirit of whatever &#8220;law&#8221;. This is biggere than the gay issue my friend. It is about the future of this small declining religion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

