Your assessment is ahistorical. These issues have also been discussed beyond the hagiographies of pseudo-Zarandi (Nabil Zarandi never authored the history attributed to him). If there was no reason for the uprisings, then you need to explain how uprisings had already occurred previous to it amongst the Isma’ili community (Agha Khan Mahalati) as well as others and why especially  the position of the Qajar monarchy and state was such that 50 years after these uprisings a revolution imposed a constitution on it and 70 years later this dynasty was abolished altogether. You are also simplifying issues into boxes which need to be engaged with critically.

Why the Babis planned such horrible acts.

I found no real  and sustainable reason to such barbarous acts.

According to Bahai books there is a sudden jump  to prepare such war act,
as if a chapter is missing.

I understood that the Bab is a very handsome and peaceful Being.
And according to the writings of Bahaullah,” thanks should be rendered to
MUllah Husein to have set the Lord upon His throne..”
through these wars acts.

Did the Babi wanted to destabilize the  then government as the political
perspective was in under  sever pressure and influences of other
countries.

Thanks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy

David Friedman and Steve Sailer
have argued that polygamy tends to benefit most women and disadvantage
most men, under the assumption that most men and women do not practice
it. The idea is firstly that many women would prefer half or one third
of someone especially appealing to being the single spouse of someone
that doesn’t provide as much economic utility to them. Secondly, that
the remaining women have a better market for finding a spouse
themselves. Say that 20% of women are married to 10% of men, that leaves
90% of men to compete over the remaining 80% of women. Friedman uses
this viewpoint to argue in favor of legalizing polygamy, while Sailer
uses it to argue against legalizing it.

In the US, the Libertarian Party supports complete decriminalization of polygamy as part of a general belief that the government should not regulate marriages.

Individualist feminism and advocates such as Wendy McElroy also support the freedom for adults to voluntarily enter polygamous marriages.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, USA, is opposed to Utah’s law against cohabitation.[91]

Those who advocate a Federal Marriage Amendment to the American Constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage generally word their proposed laws to also prohibit polygamy. Many proponents of same-sex marriage are also in favour of maintaining current statutory prohibitions against polygamy.[citation needed]

Stanley Kurtz, a fellow at the Hudson Institute, lamented the modern
arguments increasingly being made by various intellectuals who call for
de-criminalizing polygamy. Kurtz concluded, “Marriage, as its
ultramodern critics would like to say, is indeed about choosing one’s
partner, and about freedom in a society that values freedom. But that’s
not the only thing it is about. As the Supreme Court justices who
unanimously decided Reynolds in 1878 understood, marriage is also about
sustaining the conditions in which freedom can thrive. Polygamy in all
its forms is a recipe for social structures that inhibit and ultimately
undermine social freedom and democracy. A hard-won lesson of Western
history is that genuine democratic self-rule begins at the hearth of the
monogamous family.”[92]

Good day.
Just to say that the study circle the well famous RUHI is a fiasco.I got news from several countries’ institutions to confirm it.The goal to set up the institute was achieved but no real increased activities after- completing the study as was the expectation.The believers was just proud to have completed all the levels, as if now they are scholar.You believe that for believers after many years as a Bahai, with a vast and profound knowledge of the faith, must now go through RUHI 1,just to be able to prepare the setting for the devotional prayer meeting which he already did for so many years, Ruhi 3 Children classes etc.But as far as I know there is no obligation to follow the Ruhi study circle.But if you don’t you will be put aside.

”You it is who, in your tens of thousands, are serving as tutors of study circles wherever receptivity is kindled. You it is who, without thought of self”.

Desir0101.

QueenTiye said
January 12, 2011 at 8:04 pm
Always someone willing to be a naysayer! Yes, some people do simply feel proud to have completed the courses. Human nature. And some feel like they are scholars – also human nature. But if they actually practiced, as Ruhi suggests, then all have increased capacity to serve the Cause. The question is – what is in their hearts to do? Or, who will ask them to serve? Dear Desir0101, why not ask some of these newly-Ruhi trained “scholars” if they would be willing to host a study group in their home, or a devotional?

QT

desir said
January 3, 2011 at 7:55 pm
Hi SEn,
Good day.
Just to say that the study circle the well famous RUHI is a fiasco.I got news from several countries’ institutions to confirm it.The goal to set up the institute was achieved but no real increased activities after- completing the study as was the expectation.The believers was just proud to have completed all the levels, as if now they are scholar.You believe that for believers after many years as a Bahai, with a vast and profound knowledge of the faith, must now go through RUHI 1,just to be able to prepare the setting for the devotional prayer meeting which he already did for so many years, Ruhi 3 Children classes etc.But as far as I know there is no obligation to follow the Ruhi study circle.But if you don’t you will be put aside.

”You it is who, in your tens of thousands, are serving as tutors of study circles wherever receptivity is kindled. You it is who, without thought of self”.

And thanks Sen for your patience.

Desir0101.

QueenTiye said
January 12, 2011 at 8:04 pm
Always someone willing to be a naysayer! Yes, some people do simply feel proud to have completed the courses. Human nature. And some feel like they are scholars – also human nature. But if they actually practiced, as Ruhi suggests, then all have increased capacity to serve the Cause. The question is – what is in their hearts to do? Or, who will ask them to serve? Dear Desir0101, why not ask some of these newly-Ruhi trained “scholars” if they would be willing to host a study group in their home, or a devotional?

QT

desir said
January 3, 2011 at 7:55 pm
Hi SEn,
Good day.
Just to say that the study circle the well famous RUHI is a fiasco.I got news from several countries’ institutions to confirm it.The goal to set up the institute was achieved but no real increased activities after- completing the study as was the expectation.The believers was just proud to have completed all the levels, as if now they are scholar.You believe that for believers after many years as a Bahai, with a vast and profound knowledge of the faith, must now go through RUHI 1,just to be able to prepare the setting for the devotional prayer meeting which he already did for so many years, Ruhi 3 Children classes etc.But as far as I know there is no obligation to follow the Ruhi study circle.But if you don’t you will be put aside.

”You it is who, in your tens of thousands, are serving as tutors of study circles wherever receptivity is kindled. You it is who, without thought of self”.

And thanks Sen for your patience.

Desir0101.

QueenTiye said
January 12, 2011 at 8:04 pm
Always someone willing to be a naysayer! Yes, some people do simply feel proud to have completed the courses. Human nature. And some feel like they are scholars – also human nature. But if they actually practiced, as Ruhi suggests, then all have increased capacity to serve the Cause. The question is – what is in their hearts to do? Or, who will ask them to serve? Dear Desir0101, why not ask some of these newly-Ruhi trained “scholars” if they would be willing to host a study group in their home, or a devotional?

QT

QueenTiye.
Good day.
Ruhi institute is a fiasco, a big fiasco in many countries. The final goal, the expectation was not achieved. Waste of money and time.
In depth Bahais have no respect for other cultures and beliefs ,its just on your lips. You really believe that you are a superior race with great wisdom and knowledge.
According to you the one who teach get 90% blessings and the listener just 10%.
You associate and mingle with others with the sole purpose to convert to bahai.
“”if they would be willing to host a study group in their home…””
Yes, Sure. Nice.
But your intent is only conversion to your faith. Conversion and again conversion.
You really have nothing to learn from others you just performing a show.
“”but if they actually practiced, as Ruhi suggest…..”
You are right’’ but if….’’ Means that you have no attain the required standard.
I hosted the meeting, we ate at the same table, have fun and prayed together but when you are in your Bahai circle, we understood that you called us NON-BAHAI.
We in fact don’t form part of your sphere of the elected ONES.
It’s in fact a great humiliation . As if we are “”PAIENS’’ ( in french).
You have every thing to change the world but not spirituality..