New Pressures Brought Against Iranian Baha’is

There is no question that the persecution of Baha’is is escalating in Iran. I wrote about this years ago as the Hojjatieh Society was re-asserting itself. Since 2005 about 200 Baha’is have been arrested with about a quarter of that number in just the past 2 months.

Here’s what I wrote back then:

The recent arrests and persecution of Baha’is in Iran are, I’m afraid, only the beginning of a renewed campaign of persecution…I pray that I am completely wrong in my understanding of the situation and wholly ignorant of the real political cross currents in Iran. I pray so because if I am right, many Baha’is are in extreme and imminent danger.

I beg them to get out, for if I am wrong, the consequence is acceptable. They and their families can build a life in one of many civilized countries in the world and simply go back when Iran’s future changes for the better. But if I’m correct, then the consequences of staying in Iran will be tragic.

According to sources from the IRI the 7 Baha’is in custody have ‘confessed’ to their crimes. There is a real danger that due to this so called confession, they may be executed. The BWC is doing whatever it can to highlight that it is not in the best interest of Iran to go forward with such a sentence. But even if this is stayed, there are darker clouds gathering on the horizon.

According to a letter written by the chief prosecutor to another government official, there is a recommendation to outlaw all Baha’i institutions, and any substitutes for such institutions.

This is the game that the Baha’is had played and gotten away with until now. That is, the official Baha’i institutions (NSA, LSA – 9 members) were illegal so they instead went with a 7 member institution that went by the name of ‘Yaran‘ or ‘Friends’. By any measure it was identical to an NSA, having the exact same authority, responsibilities and duties. This hardly camouflaged stratagem seemed to have been tolerated – until recently.

But if this becomes law, then the Baha’is in Iran are painted in a corner because the community is forced to operate as independent groups rather than as a cohesive organization. Perhaps this wouldn’t be disastrous under normal circumstances because then individual believers and groups would be autonomous but what you can be sure that what Iran has in mind is to isolate and weaken the Baha’is so that it can persecute them and harm them with impunity.

The most dangerous move by the IRI and a further ratcheting up of pressure is the very recent and official outlawing of Baha’i meetings or gatherings of any kind, even 19 day feasts. This does, in effect, isolate Baha’is and prevents them from even seeking each other’s company.

Although we hear just about the 7 ‘Friends’ there are many more Baha’is that are either in custody right now or are out on bail – having given up their means of livelihood and material possessions. Their lives are equally in peril. We don’t know their names as well as the quasi-NSA members but all in all there are about 30 of them in direct danger.

I am dumbfounded that as the storms slowly and systematically gathered, the Baha’is of Iran were instructed to stay and to endure. My prayers and thoughts go to them and their loved ones. I’m praying not only for their safety but also for the miracle that the UHJ/ITC will see the light and start to encourage and help them evacuate to safety.

There is a flight to safety with Iranian Baha’is leaving every day. But again, what I can not fathom is that an institution that should be there for them as support isn’t doing what it clearly demonstrated it could do to help them back in the 1980′s.

The history of persecutions, of course, stretches back all the way to the mid 1800′s – but here are just a few documented cases:

Related posts:

  1. Video Contest for Iranian Baha’i Rights
  2. Arrested Iranian Baha’is Face Islamic Court
  3. Iranian Baha’is letter to IRI
  4. Persecution of Iranian Baha’is Linked to Hojatieh
  5. On the Persecution of Iranian Baha’is

  • farhan

    Pey wrote : So if the UHJ can't make a mistake (which is bs because Shoghi Effendi said they could; that's why they needed a Guardian to keep them in check) then they should be able to do whatever they want and we submit- period.

    Pey, you are projecting on the members of Baha’i institutions what you see in the world around you. People do not become Baha’is, nor do they accept to serve on institutions in order to « do what they want ». They come in to serve humanity by applying God’s prescription for humanity. An example of this is the refusal of the Hands of the Cause to be candidates for the UHJ in 1963. Those who are power seeking and enter the field of service because of personal ambitions are soon disappointed and leave.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/farhan farhan

    Pey wrote : So if the UHJ can't make a mistake (which is bs because Shoghi Effendi said they could; that's why they needed a Guardian to keep them in check) then they should be able to do whatever they want and we submit- period.

    Pey, you are projecting on the members of Baha’i institutions what you see in the world around you. People do not become Baha’is, nor do they accept to serve on institutions in order to « do what they want ». They come in to serve humanity by applying God’s prescription for humanity. An example of this is the refusal of the Hands of the Cause to be candidates for the UHJ in 1963. Those who are power seeking and enter the field of service because of personal ambitions are soon disappointed and leave.

  • Pingback: If Infallible, Why Do We Need to Elect the UHJ? at Baha’i Rants

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Baquia Baquia

    Brilliant question. Loved it so much I wrote about it here, with my own attempt at an answer.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Baquia Baquia

    Brilliant question. Loved it so much I wrote about it here, with my own attempt at an answer.

  • farhan

    Curious wrote : When a group is given so much authority they can do what they want. Scary.

    Don’t be scared, Curious. The authority of the UHJ only shelters the believers who seek that shelter, and if, as I believe it, in some centuries the entire world seeks that same shelter, it will only be offered too those who request their arbitration and not those who want to be arbitrated elsewhere. BTW, what better solution than an election do you offer? Or do you believe that personal conscience being supreme, each and every one can choose his and her individual line of action without any arbitration or coordination?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/farhan farhan

    Curious wrote : When a group is given so much authority they can do what they want. Scary.

    Don’t be scared, Curious. The authority of the UHJ only shelters the believers who seek that shelter, and if, as I believe it, in some centuries the entire world seeks that same shelter, it will only be offered too those who request their arbitration and not those who want to be arbitrated elsewhere. BTW, what better solution than an election do you offer? Or do you believe that personal conscience being supreme, each and every one can choose his and her individual line of action without any arbitration or coordination?

  • farhan

    Friends, here is a moving account by a prisonner in Iran:
    http://www.iranpresswatch.org/2009/04/setting-out

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/farhan farhan

    Friends, here is a moving account by a prisonner in Iran:
    http://www.iranpresswatch.org/2009/04/setting-out

  • AmadodeDios

    A general comment to express my appreciation, which I will insert here in this discussion of administrative inadequacy.
    To our friends who have attempted to deal with the tremendous institutions (those that are supposedly infallible sometimes and those that are most certainly never infallible) my deepest thanks.
    Now that a couple of the rudest old coots are retiring from the UHJ, I was preparing a last-chance letter, suggesting that they straighten out their irresponsible actions before they leave forever.
    Having read through such attempts to elicit a reasonable response from these prideful bullies, I realize I can use my time more profitably than in explaining to dogs why they should stop barking at me.
    Friends, your suffering (annoyances, whatever) from dealing with these arbitrary tyrants have freed me (and perhaps lots of others) – like Baha'u'llah accepting chains to free us from ours.
    Very sincerely, thank you!
    Amado