Peter Khan Passes Away

Previous member of the Universal House of Justice Peter Khan has passed away today. Over the years we’ve discussed Khan’s extremist viewpoints more than a few times. He was also a key player in Alison Marshall’s expulsion as well as the UHJ member with the portfolio of Asia sent to pummel into submission the New Zealand Baha’i community when they balked at her treatment by the institutions.

Below is the message from the UHJ:

We grieve at the sudden passing of our dearly loved former colleague Peter J. Khan, whose many years of service in the Holy Land, concluded so recently, are still fresh in our memories. By any measure, his was a remarkable life, one of earnest striving, of unbending resolve, of unflinching dedication to principle, and of constancy of effort. Discovering the Faith in his early youth, he had an unbroken record of outstanding service that included membership of the National Spiritual Assembly of Australia, of the Auxiliary Board for Propagation in North America, of the Continental Board of Counsellors in Australasia, and of the International Teaching Centre and that culminated in his election to the Universal House of Justice on which body he served for twenty-three years. His considerable intellectual gifts manifested themselves in every aspect of his service to the Cause of God: in his stalwart defence of the Covenant, in the exemplary manner in which he discharged his manifold administrative duties, in his acquainting generations of youth with the transforming vision of Shoghi Effendi, in his championing the advancement of women, in his diligent attention to the stewardship of the Faith’s material resources, and in his presentations of the verities of the Cause with uncommon eloquence and endearing humour to unnumbered audiences–lifting hearts, stimulating minds, galvanizing spirits. The Faith of God has lost a distinguished servant.

Our condolences are extended to his beloved wife Janet, his collaborator and devoted companion. We shall offer ardent prayers at the Sacred Threshold that his illumined soul may be joyously received in the Abha Kingdom and immersed in the ocean of divine grace. We call upon the friends to hold befitting memorial gatherings in his honour throughout the Baha’i community, including in all the Houses of Worship.

The Universal House of Justice

Peter Khan was a member of the UHJ from 1987 to 2009 (when he retired):

Related posts:

  1. “Unique Features of Baha’i Service” by Dr. Peter Khan
  2. Universal House of Justice: Results of By-Election
  3. The Trouble with the World
  4. Two Openings in Universal House of Justice
  5. Several Baha’i Documents & Speeches

  • Fubar

    As I said before, I hope that Khan’s spirit is liberated from the suffering and clinging to power and ego (that it was bound to in life on the physical plane of existence) as it enters the Great Emptiness.

    Khan was the single worst symbol of intellectual and spiritual corruption at a high level of global haifan bahaism.

    Khan was a vile encourager of fundamentalism and other superficial and inauthentic forms of spirituality.

    Khan was a clever deciever who promoted spirituality while working against spiritual liberation and for a broken, exploitive and oppresive version of religion.

    Khan’s life follows a pattern typical of manipulative sociopaths in positions of power – poeple lacking in true compassion and altruism.

    Khan rose to popular and power by promoting false ideas and pandering to people’s weaknesses.

    Khan attempted to barter access to spirituality, one of the deepest and most vile human activities possible.

    The particular weaknesses that Khan promoted on his rise to power were all of the things that have been pointed out on this blog for years as being wrong with bahai culture.

    If you are incapable of understanding or accepting that those things are wrong with bahai culture, then you will never understand the validity and legitimacy of the criticisms of Khan’s hideous corruption of religious leadership.

    What is distasteful is your defense of a deeply dysfunctional form of religious culture and associated institutional religious leadership that is incompetent, conformist and autocratic.

    People’s yearning for spirituality is valid, but the way that Khan exploited such yearning, and lowered it to the level of a broken, missionary culture that promotes false religious superiority, is deserving of deep revulsion.

    Khan was the product and advocate of a dysfunctional religious culture.

    Khan squandered his talents and energies on a project that is largely a construct of illusions and lies.

    Khan was a person incapable of speaking against the many injustices within bahai culture.

  • Fubar

    As I said before, I hope that Khan’s spirit is liberated from the suffering and clinging to power and ego (that it was bound to in life on the physical plane of existence) as it enters the Great Emptiness.

    Khan was the single worst symbol of intellectual and spiritual corruption at a high level of global haifan bahaism.

    Khan was a vile encourager of fundamentalism and other superficial and inauthentic forms of spirituality.

    Khan was a clever deciever who promoted spirituality while working against spiritual liberation and for a broken, exploitive and oppresive version of religion.

    Khan’s life follows a pattern typical of manipulative sociopaths in positions of power – poeple lacking in true compassion and altruism.

    Khan rose to popular and power by promoting false ideas and pandering to people’s weaknesses.

    Khan attempted to barter access to spirituality, one of the deepest and most vile human activities possible.

    The particular weaknesses that Khan promoted on his rise to power were all of the things that have been pointed out on this blog for years as being wrong with bahai culture.

    If you are incapable of understanding or accepting that those things are wrong with bahai culture, then you will never understand the validity and legitimacy of the criticisms of Khan’s hideous corruption of religious leadership.

    What is distasteful is your defense of a deeply dysfunctional form of religious culture and associated institutional religious leadership that is incompetent, conformist and autocratic.

    People’s yearning for spirituality is valid, but the way that Khan exploited such yearning, and lowered it to the level of a broken, missionary culture that promotes false religious superiority, is deserving of deep revulsion.

    Khan was the product and advocate of a dysfunctional religious culture.

    Khan squandered his talents and energies on a project that is largely a construct of illusions and lies.

    Khan was a person incapable of speaking against the many injustices within bahai culture.

  • Fubar

    Hey Masud,

    The prohibition on women be elected to the UHJ is an absurd form of “groupism”. The complete lack of any logical or scriptural basis has been debated for many years. The only defense of the exclusion ultimately rests of irrational, premodern constructs, and autocracy (corrupt, elite power, lack of accountability and transparency).

    Basic equality is a larger issue than that of postmodern feminism, which has many flaws and problems.

    The electorate are not functioning on a rational basis, they are being manipulated into voting to maintain the status quo.

    Many examples of attacks on nonconformsts at national conventions and similar venues provide sufficient evidence of the real operations of bahai electoral processes as a mechanism to enforce conformism.

    The simple fact is that nothing creative or original has come from bahai administration for a very long time. Rather, there is dysfunction, incompetence and exploitation, bartering of access to spirituality.

    Any competent sociologist would recognise the forms of manipulation and groupthink in about 15 minutes of observation of a typical bahai community.

    Bahaism is a culturally and paradigmatically limited construct of a specific culture that is incapable of being open to all forms and paths of spirituality.

    Bahaism provides few useful answers to the problems of postmodern culture.

    Any rudimentary, scientific examination of the evolutionary origins of the human species will quickly lead to the realizations that:

    1) there are more than two human genders,
    2) gender differences are deeply imprinted into human beings for evolutionary reasons, including:
    3) cultural, physical, intellectual, and psychological,
    and
    3) those differences are not univerally applicable to all members of a given gender (there is wide variation of experssion)

    The existence of real gender differences has no relation of the issue of women to religious institutions.

    The exclusion of women from a body such as the UHJ is nothing but an example of backward, premodern religious culture.

    The attacks by a male religious body, and its various defenders and apologists, on bahais that refuse to conform of such backward beliefs, is a sad example of the kind of autocratic religious culture that is typical of the backward society that bahaism rose from.

    Such attacks are the opposite of the spiritual liberation, pluralism and univeralism that people yearn for.

    Such attacks do nothing but cement the image of bahaism as a backward religion controlled by fundamentalists.

  • Fubar

    Desir,

    Thanks for the excellent observations.

    The basic point of Integral theory is to advance the idea of developmental theory/theories as a legitimate paradigm for understanding human existence (consciousness) and its advancements and regressions.

    As modernism (and its fundamental premise: scientific rationalism) disintegrates, along with its social, political and economic structures, and as postmodernism flounders in political correctness and “style over substance”, humanity is in search of some higher form of organization that will give meaning to life in an interconnected, global culture.

    The old paradigms are in a natural state of conflict with each other. Liberalism seeks to destroy conservatism, and vice versa.

    Postmodernism seeks to destroy modernism (and vice versa), both seek to destroy premodernism.

    A viewpoint that weeks to seek truth in all of its various forms will potentially lead to a more compassionate, altruistic form of spirituality that does not need to be in conflict with other paradigms, and does not need to impose itself via a missionary paradigm, or via postmodern political correctness/thought policing.

    The metaphysics developed in premodern cultures provide a way to rediscover the cultural roots of spirituality in various cultures.

    If such spirituality can become pluralistic, and then evolutionary, it may provide a path away from the historical need for “in groups” and conflicts between people holding to various paradigms.

  • Fubar

    The foundations of modernism and postmodernism are weakening and becoming increasingly discredited. Imperial systems are collapsing and undergoing a crisis of legitimization and potential regression to lower orders of stability/order. (Koestler)

    (Democratic republics {state capitalism} are becoming Corporate Plutocracies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Preston , see below )

    Regression to hero myths will not likely be culturally expressed in a manner that is pluralistic or democratic.

    How can tradtional forms of spirituality provide a path through, and out of, the disintegration and chaos of modernism and postmodernism (see further below for one description of such disintegration) without being regressive?

    How can traditional forms of spirituality provide the basis of a response to the problems of power and money destroying the “lifeworld” and culture of the people?

    http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/econn/econn112.htm

    excerpt:

    | The phrase “means of acquiring credit” …
    | is a particularly significant one as the purpose of state control over
    | banking and the issuance of money serves to narrowly constrict the
    | supply of available credit which in turn renders entrepreneurship
    | inaccessible to the majority of the population at large.  Indeed,
    | Murray Rothbard argued that bankers as a class “are inherently
    | inclined towards statism” [4] as they are typically involved with
    | unsound
    | practices, such as fractional reserve credit, that subsequently lead to
    | calls for assistance from the state, or derive much of their business
    | from direct involvement with the state, for instance, through the
    | underwriting of government bonds.  Therefore, the banking class
    | becomes the financial arm of the state not only by specifically
    | underwriting the activities of the state, such as war, plunder and
    | repression, but also by serving to create and maintain a plutocracy
    | of businessmen, manufacturers, politically-connected elites and
    | others able to obtain access to the narrowly constricted supply of
    | credit within the context of the market distortions generated by
    | the state’s money monopoly. [5]

  • Fubar

    googling “harvey mansfield ayn rand C SPAN. ” didn’t turn up anything containing details of Manfield’s criticism of Rand, at least not that was easy to find.

    Apparently C-SPAN’s “booknotes” archives don’t go back to 2005, which is when I probably heard Manfield’s comments about Rand on C-SPAN.

  • Guest

    What a Universal house of justice beitoladle aazame elahi
    14 years ago this house promised to answer about a very delicate situation created in Rome and also in Canada

    i am still waiting

    Extremist ?? what are you talking about?

    Bahai from Babi from Sheikhi from Shiah 12 Emami from muhammadan islam and you talk about a person LOL

  • Wahid Azal

    A poem from Rumi’s Masnavi for Peter Khan/Con

    مرگِ بَد، با صد فضیحت، ای پدر تو شهیدی دیده ای از كیر خر ؟

    A bad death with a hundred ignominies, O father
    Have you ever seen a martyr to a donkey’s penis?
    – Rumi (my trans.)

  • Sarmad

    If you have innocently wandered onto this website please do not take at face value what you are reading.  This is a nest of hysterical Baha’i haters who are trying to fool you.  I strongly advise against ingesting this brand of opium.  It is addictive but utterly corrosive and damaging.  For instance, tonight I have been unable to pull myself away even though I feel violently sick.  Wahid Azal’s remarks may shock you, but it is fairly easy to visit a few websites and discover more about him.  Then you may be able to judge better.  However, best just to ignore this trash.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=626152926 Nima W. Azal

    Yes, search more websites with my name to learn more about the nastiness of Bahais and how these people are the mirror copy of the fascists ruling Iran, on one hand, and how their whole establishment is a comprador lackey to the agendas of Anglo-European neo-colonialism in the Middle East.

  • Fubar

    Excellent example of the typical Jungian (psychological) shadow that is used to maintain dysfunctional bahai culture/administration.

    Everything you say (ignoring personal insults, which are prohibited by your religion) is actually just a “mirror” of what is wrong within haifan bahaism:

    1. mainstream bahai groupthink promotes “hate” of nonconformists, critics, dissidents, reformers, etc.

    2. constant brainwashing (“opium”) is promoted within mainstream bahaism, unexamined cultural biases, exploitation by bahai administration and leadership elites is ignored, and bizarre historical incidents of abuses largely “forgotten” within mainstream brainwashed/opiumized culture. Attacks by bahai administration on scholars and activists such as Mazandarani, Louis Gregory from an early time in the religion’s history, and have continued.

    3. bahai lies and deception are “addicting” – in spite of overwhelming evidence of a dysfunctional organizational culture and lots of very bad theology, people continue to defend and support the mainstream haifan bahai religion, which regularly exploits people then covers up the damage to protect the shared illusion that the religion is “perfect” (purity myth) and is guided by “infallible” entities.

    When all the above problems are pointed out, a critic is accused of being “spiritually inferior”.

    mainstream haifan bahaism seeks to convert people and then exploit them.

    the version of religion you are promoting is very unenlightened, and culturally imperialistic.

    your own religion tells you that because it has become dysfunctional, it would be better not not have it.

    what is it that you do not understand?

    why do you cling to illusions and lies that have nothing to do with reality?

    it is very east to find many other spiritually oriented groups that promote enlighenment, spiritual transformation and social change/justice in far better ways than does mainstream haifan bahaism.

    http://www.wiserearth.org was set up to coordinate a list of (one million) 1,000,000 NGOs and other civil society and sustainability groups that actually work for a better world, without needing to convert and brainwash people (which is what you are trying to do).

    please stop the lies and instead, actually do something to make the world a better place, without the absurd, backward religious insanity and dysfunctionality.

  • Anonymous

    Ok. I haven’t been on this site for some time because it’s gotten so confusing to read through all the long posts by just a handful of people. So unfortunately, I’ve ignored the site for the most part. But today, I was bored. :) So…
    Peter, the problem is that on this issue as so many others you are stuck in the letters of secretaries writing on behalf of Shoghi Effendi. Wether you are correct or the other posters are correct, doesn’t matter. The truth is that not permitting women on an elected body simply because they have a vagina is DISCRIMINATION. Go look up that word please. So I don’t care how you try to bend it backwards, forward or sideways, in the end it is a slap in the face to the principle of equality of the sexes- PERIOD! So do all the mental gymnastics that you want to do to prove to yourself that it is not discrimination, but it is. So don’t feel shocked or annoyed when normal thinking people in this world are being taught that the Faith believes in the equality of men and women and then you turn around and tell them, but women aren’t allowed on the ultimate decision making body. Why? Well because of dogma. Because it says so right here! 
    Can you not see for a second how your mentality is absolutely no different from the fundamentalist Christian who does the exact same thing when pointing to the Bible? You are really no different; but unfortunately Bahais still wanna believe they are so progressive and new. NOT!

  • Anonymous

    Well Masud, why wouldn’t incumbents want to protect their jobs? Wouldn’t you? Why wouldn’t someone who’s done nothing all his life but to get paid through the Bahai funds not want to continue in that, when they maybe aren’t suited at this point in their life for much else? If you knew you could guarantee your job security having ‘served’ for so long in a position, would you do it? Of course you would. What you may take as a negative worldly view devoid of the high level of spirituality one needs to just trust elected Bahai officials, is actually the normal thinking person’s view in this world. SO don’t be surprised if people consider YOUR view of such mindless acceptance a little fundamentalist in nature or what you termed “brainwashed buffoons”. But again Bahais live in this cloistered world of their  own where they think their system and their views are just PERFECT. Meanwhile the rest of the world just shakes its head “you are a cassette tape thinking it is an MP3″. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=626152926 Nima W. Azal

    Juan Cole has made quite a compelling argument that the rise of Baha’ism, a
    religious offshoot of Babism, can be considered in favorable lights as a form of indigenous modernity. See his Modernity and the Millennium: The Genesis of the Baha’i Faith in the Nineteenth-Century Middle East. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. Though cogent and worthy of critical attention, Juan Cole’s argument is untenable. From its very inception, the pacifist universalism of Baha’ism has played squarely into the hands of British colonialism, and as such has been a hindrance rather than a help in the course of Muslim and Arab encounters with their colonial conquerors.

    Hamid Dabashi, Islamic Liberation Theology: Resisting Empire (Routledge: New York, 2008) p.269n19.

  • Concourse on Low

    If you have innocently wandered onto this website please take Sarmad’s comment as an illustrative example of the lamentable level of discourse current in the Baha’i community.

  • Fubar

    Nima, as you probably know far better than I do, Cole has been seriously discredited because of his statements in support of the war in Libya.

  • Fubar

    Hey CoL,

    agreed.

    most bahai bullying of critics and dissidents in cyberspace are unsophisticated, pathetic and cowardly. Sarmad’s cowardice is typical. He is presumably used to some fascist LSA or Ax. Bored Members doing the dirty work attacking   bahai nonconformists, critics or dissidents that pop their heads up in normal life.

    to be fair and balanced, compassion should be extended to people that have been brainwashed by evil forces.

    also, please comment on “CESNUR Paper: Bahai Dissent by Bei Dawei” , if possible.

  • Fubar

    Far more distrubing is the evidence that abdul-baha really did think that having women on “houses of justice” was a bad idea in some cases. Well, actually that could be understandable in the case of attacks by religious extremists in Iran 100 years ago. But not in the case of the Chicago bahais, which is what the issue was originally about.

    The far more distrubing aspect is that some obscure historical documentation has been “frozen in time” and used far beyond the original context, to legitimize institutionalized gender discrimination.

    There is a cultural “logic” (or “illogic”) behind the issue: in the bahai system, the cultural expression of autocratic male power is preserved, including the dreary and predictable islamic theology/ “interpretation” that justifies (male) “infallibility”. Daddy-God archetype writ large.

    The bahai system, as practiced, is rigidly orthodox and reactionary.

    All complaints, protests, non-conformance, dissent, or criticism are marginalized and attacked to preserve the underlying mythic-conformist belief in the need to preserve autocratic male power.

    Such a belief is culturally limited, and far from “universal” in the positive sense of the word.

    On a practical level, allowing women at a high level would probably not result in reforms within bahaism in the short term, the women selected would be products of the system, and initially would most likely only “dare” to ask for very small changes (if any).

    Controversy about a change agenda at a high level would most likely backfire on reformers in the short run and make them “unpopular”.

  • Amado

    Amen!

  • Amado

    Nice analogy – religion should be like “music” – lots of variety, all beautiful!

  • Starr* Saffa

     When the Intelligent Mind is used for Truth it becomes apparent for those who have eyes…:) 

    I read that Teachers/Prophets once came to different parts of the world where assistance was needed. However, the people chose what they wanted to practice from those teachings.

    So I like your idea of honing in on the Guidance that uplifts…presented with musical art (being discerning not to pair such music with what is not in alignment with the Divine Will). 

    Here is a recent publication of a video that celebrates the Ever-Creating Spirit that Tahirih Manifested.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyptLOJw6yc

    And another one about Free-Will. It is useful as humanity moves away from separation.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1yNJXRoh3s&NR=1

  • http://www.facebook.com/danjjensen Dan Jensen

    Cole can be informative but has proven highly biased and given to taking sides, and so he must be taken with a couple heaping teaspoons of salt.

  • http://www.facebook.com/danjjensen Dan Jensen

    I have only this to say:

    KHAAAAAAN!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRnSnfiUI54

  • Wahid Azal

    He is also apparently a consultant working for the CIA these days:
    http://warisacrime.org/content/meet-professor-juan-cole-consultant-cia

  • Wahid Azal

    Cole is a giant ass. A complete, total and complete jerk of a Neo-Liberal sell-out and war-warmongering nincompoop! Like I just posted to Dan, he is also apparently consulting the CIA these days. That said, here another quote for the ages about Bahaism from the same book by Hamid Dabashi:

    “What the Babi Movement of the middle of the nineteenth century and the Constitutional Revolution of the end of the nineteenth/beginning of
    the twentieth century ultimately reveal is how as soon as the
    insurrectionary spirit of Shi’ism degenerates in one case it resuscitates itself in another. As soon as the Babi movement of the middle of the century degenerated into the Baha’i religion, the Constitutional Revolution of the end of the century becomes the repository of all the hopes and aspirations that were brutally murdered with the execution of Bab in 1850. The collective spirit of protest that is in Shi’ism in its most insurrectionary moments divests its aspirations from the lofty but irrelevant and megalomaniac claims of Baha’ullah and invests them in local and anonymous figures far closer to their miseries and hopes. The Constitutional Revolution thus rises like a sphinx from the ashes
    of the Babi Movement (p.83)….Baha’ullah systematically eradicated every ounce of revolutionary energy from Babism and put it squarely at the service of the reigning monarchy and of Russian and then British colonialism. By the time that Iranians were getting ready to tear down the very foundation of Qajar monarchy in the course of the Constitutional Revolution, Baha’ullah officially sided with [Nasiruddin] Shah. His son and successor Abd al-Baha went even further and was knighted by George V, and under the British mandate established the center of his vanity in Haifa…(p.83)”

  • Steve

    “The Constitutional Revolution thus rises like a sphinx from the ashes
    of the Babi Movement (p.83)”

    Correction: Your quote is from page 80.

  • Wahid Azal

    Yes, p.80. It was a typo. And your point is, what…???

  • Steve

    You’re welcome.

  • Mahmoudbanairabbani

    AllahuAbha,

    Dear bahai scholars and friends

    Muhammadan rasullullah PBUH enjoined (what a beautiful bahai word) the muhammadan males to shave there, and not the ladies.

    I have 2 important questions, please help:

    1-why not ladies?
    2-what his successor (Bahaullah, Arvahana le vahdatahulfada) orderd?

    Even if you do NOT have the quotation is OK for me, just wanted to know if bahai males are shaved; I don´t care about the law for females

    thanks and best regards

    This is a real question please help

    AllahuAba

  • Wahid Azal

    Dear Mahmoud,

    I am not a Bahai, but on what hadith do you base your assertion that Muhammad (pbuh) enjoined the shaving of [presumably 'pubic'] hair for men and not women? There are hadith quoted in texts of Shi’ite fiqh that actually prescribe such shaving for both sexes, and not just men. Besides the issue of ritual purity (tahara) and basic hygiene, other reasons adduced are various from one faqih and mufassir to the next, but one theological reason given by certain theologian-jurisprudents is that excess hair [in the pubic parts] attracts malefic jinn (elemental spirits) who inspire excessive lust (shahwa).

    Allahu Akbar!

  • novizio

    July 15, 2011january 2012 no news good news