<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Concept of Infallibility In The Baha&#8217;i Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html</link>
	<description>A Baha'i blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe </title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-68807</link>
		<dc:creator>joe </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-68807</guid>
		<description>WRONG. YOU know NOTHING about Arabic apparently!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Arabic is read from right to left which in this instant gives you the word LIVE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WRONG. YOU know NOTHING about Arabic apparently!!</p>
<p>Arabic is read from right to left which in this instant gives you the word LIVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If Infallible, Why Do We Need to Elect the UHJ? at Baha&#8217;i Rants</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-63086</link>
		<dc:creator>If Infallible, Why Do We Need to Elect the UHJ? at Baha&#8217;i Rants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-63086</guid>
		<description>[...] Previous Discussions: The Concept of Infallibility in the Baha&#8217;i Faith Is the Universal House of Justice Infallible? (Part I) Is the Universal House of Justice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previous Discussions: The Concept of Infallibility in the Baha&#8217;i Faith Is the Universal House of Justice Infallible? (Part I) Is the Universal House of Justice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introduction at Baha&#8217;i Rants</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-45547</link>
		<dc:creator>Introduction at Baha&#8217;i Rants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-45547</guid>
		<description>[...] on so many aspects of our community. I believe deepening on the meaning and significance of &#8216;infallibility&#8216; - in the context of the language and culture that it was used - would go towards removing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on so many aspects of our community. I believe deepening on the meaning and significance of &#8216;infallibility&#8216; &#8211; in the context of the language and culture that it was used &#8211; would go towards removing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LA Class Newsletter [#31]</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-39946</link>
		<dc:creator>LA Class Newsletter [#31]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-39946</guid>
		<description>[...] provide some sort of infallible oracle to which one can put all questions for the final [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] provide some sort of infallible oracle to which one can put all questions for the final [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz Gormann</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-35689</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz Gormann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-35689</guid>
		<description>Abdul-Baha allow some men to have 3 wives after he said this.
Don&#039;t know where I read it, probebly on the BahaiRant pages what a great Blob that is.

Why say one thing then allow an other.

Like no women on the uhj and inhardence largest share going to man.

Equality of Men and women?

Fritz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abdul-Baha allow some men to have 3 wives after he said this.<br />
Don&#8217;t know where I read it, probebly on the BahaiRant pages what a great Blob that is.</p>
<p>Why say one thing then allow an other.</p>
<p>Like no women on the uhj and inhardence largest share going to man.</p>
<p>Equality of Men and women?</p>
<p>Fritz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz Gormann</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-77633</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz Gormann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-77633</guid>
		<description>Abdul-Baha allow some men to have 3 wives after he said this.
Don&#039;t know where I read it, probebly on the BahaiRant pages what a great Blob that is.

Why say one thing then allow an other.

Like no women on the uhj and inhardence largest share going to man.

Equality of Men and women?

Fritz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abdul-Baha allow some men to have 3 wives after he said this.<br />
Don&#8217;t know where I read it, probebly on the BahaiRant pages what a great Blob that is.</p>
<p>Why say one thing then allow an other.</p>
<p>Like no women on the uhj and inhardence largest share going to man.</p>
<p>Equality of Men and women?</p>
<p>Fritz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baquia</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-35673</link>
		<dc:creator>Baquia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-35673</guid>
		<description>Peyamb,
Abdu&#039;l-Baha was the interpreter, however it defies logic that one would interpret something to mean its opposite. The Master&#039;s guidance regarding this topic is misunderstood. What you&#039;ve written is what most Baha&#039;is are taught. Yet it is wrong.

The truth is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://bahairants.com/its-a-little-known-fact-4-132-132.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Little known fact&quot;&lt;/a&gt; !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peyamb,<br />
Abdu&#8217;l-Baha was the interpreter, however it defies logic that one would interpret something to mean its opposite. The Master&#8217;s guidance regarding this topic is misunderstood. What you&#8217;ve written is what most Baha&#8217;is are taught. Yet it is wrong.</p>
<p>The truth is a <a href="http://bahairants.com/its-a-little-known-fact-4-132-132.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Little known fact&#8221;</a> !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baquia</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-77632</link>
		<dc:creator>Baquia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-77632</guid>
		<description>Peyamb,
Abdu&#039;l-Baha was the interpreter, however it defies logic that one would interpret something to mean its opposite. The Master&#039;s guidance regarding this topic is misunderstood. What you&#039;ve written is what most Baha&#039;is are taught. Yet it is wrong.

The truth is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://bahairants.com/its-a-little-known-fact-4-132-132.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Little known fact&quot;&lt;/a&gt; !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peyamb,<br />
Abdu&#8217;l-Baha was the interpreter, however it defies logic that one would interpret something to mean its opposite. The Master&#8217;s guidance regarding this topic is misunderstood. What you&#8217;ve written is what most Baha&#8217;is are taught. Yet it is wrong.</p>
<p>The truth is a <a href="http://bahairants.com/its-a-little-known-fact-4-132-132.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Little known fact&#8221;</a> !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peyamb</title>
		<link>http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html/comment-page-1#comment-35665</link>
		<dc:creator>Peyamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bahairants.com/the-concept-of-infallibility-in-the-bahai-faith-399.html#comment-35665</guid>
		<description>Bahaullah said two wives max, but conditional on treating both equally. Abdul-Baha explained that Bahaullah was stating the impossible- that you could not treat to people 100% equally in such a relationship as marriage, therefore Bahaullah was really promoting monogomy. I think it had to do also with the crowd that Bahaullah spoke to. To propose monogomy at that time would have been suicide for his young Faith. The Bahai Faith was mean to be a dynamic religion that adapts to needs of the times- with official interpreters. That&#039;s what I loved about the Faith. Unfortunately, it has become totally stagnant now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bahaullah said two wives max, but conditional on treating both equally. Abdul-Baha explained that Bahaullah was stating the impossible- that you could not treat to people 100% equally in such a relationship as marriage, therefore Bahaullah was really promoting monogomy. I think it had to do also with the crowd that Bahaullah spoke to. To propose monogomy at that time would have been suicide for his young Faith. The Bahai Faith was mean to be a dynamic religion that adapts to needs of the times- with official interpreters. That&#8217;s what I loved about the Faith. Unfortunately, it has become totally stagnant now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

